Blog
Fly the Sleazy Skies
December 7, 2009
  • Share
  • The Federal Election Commission – the supposed referee of fair campaigning – has just created an ethics loophole big enough for lobbyists to fly a corporate jet through. The commission has taken upon itself to reverse the Senate’s self-restriction against lawmakers’ cozy cut-rate travels on corporate jets.

    The planes were long provided on demand from favor-seeking executives and lobbyists intent on private time with lawmakers. But, two years after the Jack Abramoff corruption scandals, the Senate banned the practice of paying a mere single-seat rate for commandeering their friendly exec’s company plane. It mandated that members pay the full (prohibitive) charter rate, as if renting the whole plane themselves. This targeted an abuse by which corporations provided jets to grateful lawmakers to dash about on political errands at token prices. (The House went the Senate one better with an outright ban on flying on noncommercial aircraft.)

    The F.E.C. gutted the reform by totally misinterpreting it to say it does not apply when a senator is traveling on behalf of assorted party committees and not as “a candidate” himself. This is nonsense by any fair reading of the Senate’s rule, which clearly considers any incumbent an ongoing candidate 24/7, regardless of announced business in hopping a corporate jet.

    The Senate, which adopted the reform overwhelmingly in 2007, should be furious at the F.E.C.’s subverting such a vital ethics reform. The chamber must quickly overrule the commission with an explicit restatement of the rule. It might also reprimand the F.E.C. for twisting a needed ethics correction.

    The underlying problem is the F.E.C.’s history of circumventing campaign law and enabling easy money abuses. We hope the Senate is red-faced enough to begin the full overhaul that the commission richly deserves. It should include quality independent appointees from President Obama, not more rubber-stamped hacks out to do the bidding of party machines.

    http://www.nytimes.com/2009/11/27/opinion/27fri4.html?_r=1&ref=opinion

    Source: NEW YORK TIMES
    Date: 2009-11-26